Interview With Gemma Del Caño: “We Have To Know What Food Security Is”
We know that it is important to make good purchases in order to eat healthy and to benefit from it . But why should we also consider food security?
Nowadays, when we talk about going shopping, it is more and more common that we worry about choosing “the best” for health and well-being. It is also common to hear the term “food security”.
We want food to be of high quality, to have adequate nutritional value and to benefit us as much as possible. In addition, we want variety and immediacy and we want to make good choices at all times. To do this, however, we must educate ourselves and carefully observe what we decide to take in the basket, and not just what we read in large print.
Gemma del Caño tells us more about food security
Gemma del Caño – better known as @farmagemma on her social networks – is a graduate in pharmacy, specializing in industrial pharmacy and R&D, holder of a master’s degree in innovation, biotechnology and food safety, scientific communicator and BRC auditor (food safety ). Today, she will help us outline and clarify some of the most common consumer concerns.
Q. How would you explain to someone unfamiliar with the term “food security” what it means?
A. It would be interesting to differentiate between “food security” and “food safety”, even though the first term is commonly used, when in fact we are referring to the second.
Food security refers to the availability of food and safety refers to the fact that the food we eat is safe, not harmful to health. However, we generally refer to safety rather than security.
Advances in safety have saved millions of lives and above all it gives us peace of mind when we go shopping for food because we know that we are not going to run into a toxic infection, a foreign body. or chemical contamination.
Obviously there is no such thing as zero risk, but today we are eating the safest foods in history.
Q. Do you think that there is enough knowledge on the streets about what is really going on in the food industry?
A. No, and the responsibility lies with the food industry itself, which for years has not been transparent and has often chosen to give in to disinformation to take advantage of consumers. This is the case, for example, with additives.
Any authorized additive is safe (which does not mean that it is necessary); if we promote an “additive-free product” as something good, we are suggesting to the consumer that the additive-free product is bad, when it is not at all.
The problem is the product, not the additive. There are foods with additives that are fantastic (like canned vegetables) and products that without additives will still be a bad option (like ultra-processed pastries).
Q. Where can we go to address our food security gaps and what would your recommendations be to the general public?
A. Food safety agencies, such as ANSES in France (National Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety), the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) or the FDA in the States United are good sources of information.
What to avoid are fake news and hoaxes from Whatsapp or Facebook that distort information or lie to gain a few clicks.
The reality is much more boring than what some people try to make us see and fear sells. We must not give in to alarming theories. Instead, we should always go to official sources. At the moment, there are also a lot of publicists in the field of food safety, who are trying to dispel certain myths.
Q. Reading the label is a recommendation made by many experts to help people know what they are buying and consuming, and to develop their own criteria. But very often, one wonders how to read it correctly. What are your recommendations?
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy